I’ve heard people talk about fishing on the “spot within a spot” but I’ve got no idea what they mean.
Well, you’re not alone. It’s completely understandable because the phrase is one that’s only come into usage fairly recently. It’s also one that is a little esoteric and interpreted differently by different people. In addition, it can be used in a slightly superior or elitist way, in a similar vein to “If you know, you know” or “Well if you don’t know, I’m not telling you”.
So what do they mean then?
In essence, it’s just a more precise way of defining a position. Using gradations of size any lake bed can be divided into zones, then areas, spots and, if we go one further a “spot within a spot”. Why on earth isn’t it called a “point within a spot”! As a generalisation, we could think of someone saying “I didn’t know which swim to pick but knew I wanted to be in that zone. You can put three rods, say ten yards apart and you’ve got them all in an area.
If you’re accurate you might fish three rods on a spot but it wouldn’t be possible to get three on a “spot within a spot” as it’s physically just too small.
When anglers refer to “a spot within a spot” they are generally talking about a specific place and are referring to the very best, position to place a hookbait.
Most of us, at some time, will have experienced a situation where we’ve got two rods a few yards away from one another and one produces three or four bites whilst the other remains silent. Now scale that down into a tighter area. Both rods on the spot but only one is on the “spot within a spot”. Some will pooh-pooh the idea of any part of a spot being better than another whilst others take placement to the nth degree and are extremely anal about the exact placement of their rig.
Do you really catch more carp fishing such a precise spot?
It might or it might not. There are too many variables to answer with any authority. Being on exactly the right bit of the lake bed could make the difference between a blank and a bite. More likely is that it will get you a bite more quickly than otherwise or enable you to catch several fish instead of just one or two. Aiming to fish on a precise small feeding spot is unlikely to do your cause any harm though and could make you feel a little more confident.
In what situations is it beneficial to fish to a “spot within a spot”?
We need to set expectations first as the concept isn’t one that can be applied every time you go fishing. In fact, it is only going to appertain to certain, fairly specific situations. Most of the time, although the concept of the “spot within a spot” might apply, it will be of little practical advantage.
Shall we dispel some myths and get rid of some of the nonsense that gets bandied around? If someone tells you they are casting a hundred yards to a “spot within a spot” you might want to take it with a pinch of salt. The chances are they’re pulling your” leg and having a laugh or testing your reaction. Maybe they haven’t completely grasped the idea or are even deluded. You never know though and it’s even possible they possess superhuman carp fishing powers! That might be a bit unfair as there are a handful of anglers that are astonishingly accurate. They are exponents of the method of fishing all their rods tight together and can cast three a mere two or three feet apart, at range, and bait on a sixpence, over the top. When they’re getting lots of bites and one of those rods is outscoring the other two it is, arguably, on a “spot within a spot”.
Locating a “spot within a spot” in the margin?
In the first instance, it’s easiest to explain fishing on a precise pinpoint piece of the lake bed in the context of close-up work and stalking carp in the margins. We’re about talking the sort of situations where you can see the bottom. You are at a distinct advantage when you are able discern the exact nature of the spot, its size, shape, the substrate as well as surrounding area. That advantage is multiplied when it’s possible to make out where on the spot your lead and rig land.
Can I fish a precise feeding area if i can’t see the bottom of the lake?
Imagine you find and study a gravel patch on the far margin, know exactly where you’d like your rig to be and cast over to it, feeling the lead down onto it. The crack of the lead hitting the gravel tells you you’re on the spot but, unless you can actually see the lead on the bottom, you’ll not know whether you’re on the “spot within the spot” or merely somewhere on the cleaned-off area.
It’s possible to apply anywhere you can either observe the lead on the lake bed or, even if it’s not visible in situ, track its descent through the water column far enough to know precisely where it has landed. You can even do it by feel if there is a discernible difference in the feedback from the bit you want your lead to land on. There are plenty of situations in which the concept of the “spot within a spot” can be used to enhance our chances effectively.
What are some examples of fishing the optimal feeding spot?
Watching carp feed in the edge
The most obvious one is stalking when you are actively looking for carp in the edge. You might have speculatively baited a few clear spots or found some carp close to the bank and given them a couple of handfuls to feed upon. Either way, if the situation is such that you’re ready to put a rig in front of them you’ll have been watching their activities for a while and almost certainly know exactly where you want to set your trap.
Casting onto the far margin bank and lowering a rig in place
It is similar in any marginal situation, where visibility is such that you can make out the detail. Now, that needn’t necessarily be the near margin. Casting over to an adjacent or opposing bank can give you the opportunity to cast onto the bank and then lower a rig down with the aid of a spare rod. Alternatively,